Updated April 2026 · FBI UCR 2023
Vehicle Theft Rates by City (2023)
Motor vehicle theft rates per 100,000 residents
Per-capita vehicle theft rates from FBI Uniform Crime Reporting data, with the U.S. national average of 318.3/100K shown alongside every city. Of 248 U.S. cities tracked here, 34 report rates above the national average and 214 below.
What the FBI Counts as Vehicle Theft
Motor vehicle theft is the theft or attempted theft of a motor vehicle — automobiles, trucks, motorcycles, and other vehicles meeting FBI definition. The category excludes farm equipment, bulldozers, airplanes, and watercraft. Motor vehicle theft is the single property-crime category that has risen sharply across many U.S. metros since 2019, driven partly by social-media-amplified vulnerabilities in specific keyless-ignition vehicle models and partly by changes in vehicle storage patterns.
National Pattern for Vehicle Theft
The U.S. national motor vehicle theft rate is 318.3 per 100,000 residents. Vehicle theft is the standout outlier in recent FBI data, with sharp increases in many metros since 2022. Two factors drive the broader pattern: a viral social-media trend exposing keyless-ignition vulnerabilities in specific vehicle models, and pandemic-era shifts in vehicle storage and street parking density. Targeted prevention measures — anti-theft devices, garage parking, lighting — have measurable effects, and several manufacturers have rolled out retrofit fixes for the most vulnerable models.
How to Read Vehicle Theft Rates by City
Vehicle theft has been the most volatile FBI category in the past five years. Cities with above-average rates of the most-targeted vehicle models tend to show the sharpest jumps. Anti-theft devices, garage parking, and the manufacturer software fixes rolled out from 2023 onward all matter for individual exposure.
City-level rates always smooth over neighborhood-level variation. A useful complement is your local police department's open-data portal, which usually publishes district- or beat-level offense counts. The FBI Crime Data Explorer is the canonical source for the figures shown below; the Bureau of Justice Statistics publishes additional context on the share of vehicle theft that goes unreported to police.
Cohort Ranked by Vehicle Theft Rate
| # | City | Population | Vehicle Theft/100K | vs National | Safety Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Norfolk, VA | 238K | 421.9 | +33% | C |
| 2 | Oklahoma City, OK | 681K | 401.4 | +26% | C |
| 3 | Jacksonville, FL | 955K | 397.8 | +25% | D |
| 4 | Mesa, AZ | 504K | 397.8 | +25% | D |
| 5 | Oxnard, CA | 202K | 389.2 | +22% | D |
| 6 | Evansville, IN | 117K | 381.7 | +20% | C |
| 7 | Lakewood, CO | 156K | 381.7 | +20% | C |
| 8 | Kansas City, MO | 508K | 371.7 | +17% | C |
| 9 | Moreno Valley, CA | 212K | 366.5 | +15% | C |
| 10 | Durham, NC | 284K | 366.5 | +15% | C |
| 11 | Riverside, CA | 315K | 363.2 | +14% | B |
| 12 | Irvine, CA | 308K | 363.2 | +14% | B |
| 13 | Salt Lake City, UT | 200K | 356.5 | +12% | C |
| 14 | Gainesville, FL | 141K | 356.5 | +12% | C |
| 15 | Salem, OR | 179K | 356.5 | +12% | D |
| 16 | Murrieta, CA | 113K | 356.5 | +12% | D |
| 17 | Buffalo, NY | 278K | 356.5 | +12% | D |
| 18 | Nashville, TN | 689K | 354.6 | +11% | B |
| 19 | Fort Worth, TX | 919K | 354.6 | +11% | D |
| 20 | Cary, NC | 175K | 352.1 | +11% | B |
| 21 | Ontario, CA | 175K | 352.1 | +11% | C |
| 22 | Manchester, NH | 116K | 352.1 | +11% | C |
| 23 | San Bernardino, CA | 222K | 339.4 | +7% | C |
| 24 | Los Angeles, CA | 4.0M | 338.2 | +6% | C |
| 25 | Baton Rouge, LA | 228K | 337.7 | +6% | B |
| 26 | Tampa, FL | 400K | 332.4 | +4% | C |
| 27 | Torrance, CA | 144K | 331.6 | +4% | C |
| 28 | Corona, CA | 157K | 331.6 | +4% | D |
| 29 | Simi Valley, CA | 127K | 331.6 | +4% | D |
| 30 | Fresno, CA | 542K | 330.4 | +4% | D |
| 31 | Fargo, ND | 126K | 328.6 | +3% | B |
| 32 | Cape Coral, FL | 194K | 328.6 | +3% | C |
| 33 | Winston-Salem, NC | 250K | 323.8 | +2% | C |
| 34 | Providence, RI | 191K | 322.5 | +1% | C |
| 35 | Dallas, TX | 1.3M | 313.5 | -2% | D |
| 36 | Boston, MA | 676K | 312.7 | -2% | C |
| 37 | Virginia Beach, VA | 459K | 312.6 | -2% | C |
| 38 | Miami, FL | 442K | 312.4 | -2% | B |
| 39 | Newark, NJ | 312K | 308.8 | -3% | C |
| 40 | Miramar, FL | 135K | 307.1 | -4% | C |
| 41 | San Jose, CA | 1.0M | 306.6 | -4% | B |
| 42 | Killeen, TX | 153K | 305.5 | -4% | B |
| 43 | Joliet, IL | 150K | 305.5 | -4% | C |
| 44 | Cleveland, OH | 373K | 301.7 | -5% | C |
| 45 | Tallahassee, FL | 196K | 300.8 | -5% | C |
| 46 | Centennial, CO | 108K | 300.8 | -5% | C |
| 47 | Savannah, GA | 148K | 293 | -8% | B |
| 48 | Surprise, AZ | 142K | 293 | -8% | B |
| 49 | Palmdale, CA | 169K | 293 | -8% | C |
| 50 | Plano, TX | 285K | 291.1 | -9% | C |
| 51 | San Diego, CA | 1.4M | 288.3 | -9% | C |
| 52 | Boise, ID | 236K | 286.3 | -10% | C |
| 53 | Wichita, KS | 398K | 286.3 | -10% | D |
| 54 | Corpus Christi, TX | 318K | 286.3 | -10% | D |
| 55 | Chicago, IL | 2.7M | 283.2 | -11% | B |
| 56 | Clearwater, FL | 117K | 282.9 | -11% | C |
| 57 | Columbia, MO | 126K | 282.9 | -11% | D |
| 58 | Paterson, NJ | 160K | 282.9 | -11% | D |
| 59 | Hampton, VA | 137K | 282.9 | -11% | D |
| 60 | Sterling Heights, MI | 134K | 282.7 | -11% | B |
| 61 | Shreveport, LA | 188K | 282.7 | -11% | C |
| 62 | Elk Grove, CA | 176K | 279.4 | -12% | C |
| 63 | Overland Park, KS | 197K | 279.4 | -12% | C |
| 64 | Sparks, NV | 108K | 279.4 | -12% | D |
| 65 | Tacoma, WA | 219K | 270.9 | -15% | C |
| 66 | Warwick, RI | 83K | 269.1 | -15% | B |
| 67 | Grand Rapids, MI | 199K | 263.4 | -17% | C |
| 68 | Carrollton, TX | 133K | 263.4 | -17% | C |
| 69 | Scottsdale, AZ | 241K | 263.2 | -17% | B |
| 70 | Charlotte, NC | 875K | 263 | -17% | C |
| 71 | Seattle, WA | 749K | 261.9 | -18% | C |
| 72 | Montgomery, AL | 201K | 260.3 | -18% | D |
| 73 | Phoenix, AZ | 1.7M | 260.2 | -18% | C |
| 74 | Charleston, SC | 150K | 259 | -19% | B |
| 75 | Thousand Oaks, CA | 127K | 259 | -19% | D |
| 76 | Orlando, FL | 308K | 258.6 | -19% | B |
| 77 | Minneapolis, MN | 430K | 258.4 | -19% | B |
| 78 | Worcester, MA | 207K | 258.4 | -19% | B |
| 79 | Murfreesboro, TN | 153K | 258.3 | -19% | B |
| 80 | Bridgeport, CT | 149K | 258.3 | -19% | B |
| 81 | Fishers, IN | 101K | 258.3 | -19% | B |
| 82 | San Francisco, CA | 874K | 253.7 | -20% | C |
| 83 | College Station, TX | 121K | 253.3 | -20% | B |
| 84 | Lubbock, TX | 264K | 251.1 | -21% | C |
| 85 | Peoria, AZ | 191K | 245.1 | -23% | B |
| 86 | Provo, UT | 115K | 245.1 | -23% | B |
| 87 | Toledo, OH | 271K | 239.1 | -25% | C |
| 88 | Hartford, CT | 121K | 238.1 | -25% | B |
| 89 | League City, TX | 115K | 238.1 | -25% | B |
| 90 | New York, NY | 8.3M | 237.7 | -25% | C |
| 91 | Akron, OH | 190K | 237.6 | -25% | B |
| 92 | Reno, NV | 264K | 237.6 | -25% | C |
| 93 | McKinney, TX | 195K | 237.6 | -25% | D |
| 94 | Alexandria, VA | 159K | 237.6 | -25% | D |
| 95 | Rancho Cucamonga, CA | 178K | 235.5 | -26% | B |
| 96 | Lakeland, FL | 113K | 235.5 | -26% | B |
| 97 | Lewisville, TX | 112K | 235.5 | -26% | B |
| 98 | Concord, CA | 129K | 235.5 | -26% | D |
| 99 | Lansing, MI | 113K | 235.5 | -26% | D |
| 100 | Independence, MO | 123K | 235.5 | -26% | D |
| 101 | Lancaster, CA | 174K | 234 | -26% | B |
| 102 | West Palm Beach, FL | 117K | 233.8 | -27% | B |
| 103 | Springfield, IL | 114K | 233.8 | -27% | B |
| 104 | Hayward, CA | 163K | 233.8 | -27% | C |
| 105 | Austin, TX | 979K | 232.8 | -27% | C |
| 106 | Richmond, VA | 227K | 231.6 | -27% | B |
| 107 | Atlanta, GA | 499K | 231.6 | -27% | D |
| 108 | Denver, CO | 716K | 229.5 | -28% | D |
| 109 | Escondido, CA | 151K | 227.2 | -29% | B |
| 110 | Meridian, ID | 118K | 227.2 | -29% | B |
| 111 | Port St. Lucie, FL | 205K | 222.2 | -30% | B |
| 112 | Hialeah, FL | 223K | 222.2 | -30% | B |
| 113 | Jersey City, NJ | 292K | 222.2 | -30% | C |
| 114 | Rapid City, SD | 78K | 219.3 | -31% | B |
| 115 | Bangor, ME | 32K | 219.3 | -31% | D |
| 116 | New Orleans, LA | 384K | 218 | -32% | D |
| 117 | Gilbert, AZ | 268K | 218 | -32% | D |
| 118 | Roseville, CA | 148K | 217.2 | -32% | C |
| 119 | Victorville, CA | 135K | 217.2 | -32% | C |
| 120 | Pittsburgh, PA | 303K | 217 | -32% | C |
| 121 | Sioux Falls, SD | 193K | 216.4 | -32% | C |
| 122 | Bellevue, WA | 152K | 216.4 | -32% | C |
| 123 | Green Bay, WI | 107K | 215 | -32% | B |
| 124 | Memphis, TN | 633K | 214.9 | -32% | B |
| 125 | Arlington, TX | 394K | 212.6 | -33% | B |
| 126 | Tucson, AZ | 543K | 212.4 | -33% | B |
| 127 | Westminster, CO | 116K | 209.6 | -34% | B |
| 128 | Arvada, CO | 124K | 209.6 | -34% | B |
| 129 | Boulder, CO | 106K | 209.6 | -34% | B |
| 130 | Broken Arrow, OK | 114K | 209.6 | -34% | D |
| 131 | Cedar Rapids, IA | 138K | 209.6 | -34% | D |
| 132 | Springfield, MA | 156K | 209.6 | -34% | D |
| 133 | Aurora, CO | 386K | 209.5 | -34% | B |
| 134 | Cheyenne, WY | 65K | 209.3 | -34% | C |
| 135 | Milwaukee, WI | 577K | 205.5 | -35% | B |
| 136 | Stockton, CA | 321K | 204.7 | -36% | B |
| 137 | Fayetteville, NC | 209K | 204.7 | -36% | B |
| 138 | Anaheim, CA | 350K | 204.7 | -36% | C |
| 139 | Fort Wayne, IN | 264K | 204.7 | -36% | C |
| 140 | Bend, OR | 99K | 203.3 | -36% | B |
| 141 | Las Vegas, NV | 647K | 202.3 | -36% | B |
| 142 | San Antonio, TX | 1.5M | 202.3 | -36% | C |
| 143 | Tempe, AZ | 181K | 201 | -37% | B |
| 144 | Waco, TX | 138K | 201 | -37% | B |
| 145 | Coral Springs, FL | 134K | 201 | -37% | B |
| 146 | Long Beach, CA | 467K | 196.8 | -38% | C |
| 147 | St. Louis, MO | 302K | 196.8 | -38% | C |
| 148 | Jackson, MS | 154K | 196.3 | -38% | B |
| 149 | Peoria, IL | 113K | 196.3 | -38% | B |
| 150 | Midland, TX | 138K | 195 | -39% | C |
| 151 | Edmond, OK | 100K | 194.4 | -39% | B |
| 152 | Sacramento, CA | 525K | 193.9 | -39% | C |
| 153 | Garland, TX | 246K | 193.9 | -39% | D |
| 154 | Little Rock, AR | 203K | 193.9 | -39% | D |
| 155 | Casper, WY | 59K | 193.6 | -39% | C |
| 156 | Philadelphia, PA | 1.6M | 192.4 | -40% | B |
| 157 | Dayton, OH | 138K | 192.3 | -40% | B |
| 158 | Thornton, CO | 142K | 192.3 | -40% | D |
| 159 | Oakland, CA | 433K | 192.2 | -40% | C |
| 160 | Frisco, TX | 201K | 192.2 | -40% | C |
| 161 | Knoxville, TN | 191K | 189.6 | -40% | B |
| 162 | Denton, TX | 148K | 189.6 | -40% | B |
| 163 | Yonkers, NY | 212K | 187.6 | -41% | C |
| 164 | Washington, DC | 690K | 185.4 | -42% | C |
| 165 | Cincinnati, OH | 309K | 184.7 | -42% | B |
| 166 | Huntsville, AL | 215K | 184.7 | -42% | B |
| 167 | Burlington, VT | 45K | 179.9 | -43% | B |
| 168 | New Haven, CT | 134K | 178.1 | -44% | C |
| 169 | Ann Arbor, MI | 124K | 178.1 | -44% | C |
| 170 | Abilene, TX | 124K | 178.1 | -44% | C |
| 171 | Macon, GA | 157K | 178.1 | -44% | C |
| 172 | Lakewood, NJ | 135K | 178.1 | -44% | C |
| 173 | Clovis, CA | 120K | 178.1 | -44% | C |
| 174 | Brownsville, TX | 187K | 177.6 | -44% | B |
| 175 | Pembroke Pines, FL | 171K | 177.6 | -44% | C |
| 176 | North Las Vegas, NV | 263K | 177 | -44% | C |
| 177 | Fremont, CA | 231K | 177 | -44% | C |
| 178 | Bakersfield, CA | 403K | 175.6 | -45% | B |
| 179 | Colorado Springs, CO | 479K | 174.9 | -45% | D |
| 180 | Santa Ana, CA | 309K | 174.9 | -45% | D |
| 181 | Chandler, AZ | 276K | 174.9 | -45% | D |
| 182 | Santa Clarita, CA | 229K | 174.9 | -45% | D |
| 183 | Houston, TX | 2.3M | 172.6 | -46% | B |
| 184 | Louisville, KY | 629K | 172.6 | -46% | C |
| 185 | Baltimore, MD | 586K | 172.6 | -46% | C |
| 186 | Chesapeake, VA | 249K | 170.8 | -46% | C |
| 187 | St. Petersburg, FL | 258K | 170.8 | -46% | C |
| 188 | Nampa, ID | 100K | 169.7 | -47% | B |
| 189 | Newport News, VA | 186K | 169.7 | -47% | C |
| 190 | Eugene, OR | 177K | 169.7 | -47% | C |
| 191 | Omaha, NE | 486K | 169.3 | -47% | B |
| 192 | Indianapolis, IN | 888K | 169.2 | -47% | C |
| 193 | El Paso, TX | 679K | 168.6 | -47% | B |
| 194 | Columbus, OH | 906K | 168.6 | -47% | B |
| 195 | Albuquerque, NM | 565K | 168.6 | -47% | D |
| 196 | Beaumont, TX | 115K | 167.1 | -48% | B |
| 197 | Tuscaloosa, AL | 100K | 165.7 | -48% | C |
| 198 | Oceanside, CA | 176K | 160.1 | -50% | C |
| 199 | West Jordan, UT | 117K | 160.1 | -50% | C |
| 200 | Round Rock, TX | 133K | 158.9 | -50% | C |
| 201 | Topeka, KS | 127K | 158.2 | -50% | B |
| 202 | Tulsa, OK | 413K | 157.8 | -50% | B |
| 203 | Raleigh, NC | 468K | 157.8 | -50% | D |
| 204 | Greensboro, NC | 299K | 157.8 | -50% | D |
| 205 | Federal Way, WA | 101K | 154.6 | -51% | C |
| 206 | Rockford, IL | 149K | 154.6 | -51% | C |
| 207 | Anchorage, AK | 291K | 154.5 | -51% | B |
| 208 | Des Moines, IA | 214K | 154.5 | -51% | B |
| 209 | Rochester, NY | 211K | 154.5 | -51% | B |
| 210 | Lexington, KY | 323K | 154.5 | -51% | C |
| 211 | Lincoln, NE | 291K | 154.5 | -51% | C |
| 212 | Chula Vista, CA | 275K | 153.9 | -52% | B |
| 213 | Laredo, TX | 255K | 153.9 | -52% | B |
| 214 | Glendale, AZ | 248K | 153.9 | -52% | B |
| 215 | Fontana, CA | 215K | 153.9 | -52% | D |
| 216 | Vallejo, CA | 122K | 153.2 | -52% | A |
| 217 | Visalia, CA | 141K | 153.2 | -52% | A |
| 218 | Norman, OK | 128K | 153.2 | -52% | C |
| 219 | Sunnyvale, CA | 156K | 153.2 | -52% | C |
| 220 | Portland, OR | 653K | 151.7 | -52% | B |
| 221 | Naperville, IL | 150K | 142.7 | -55% | B |
| 222 | Palm Bay, FL | 120K | 142.7 | -55% | B |
| 223 | Billings, MT | 117K | 142.7 | -55% | B |
| 224 | Charleston, WV | 47K | 141.6 | -56% | C |
| 225 | Henderson, NV | 320K | 140.3 | -56% | B |
| 226 | Tyler, TX | 106K | 139.8 | -56% | C |
| 227 | Pasadena, TX | 152K | 139.3 | -56% | B |
| 228 | Mobile, AL | 187K | 139.3 | -56% | B |
| 229 | Birmingham, AL | 201K | 138.5 | -56% | A |
| 230 | Madison, WI | 270K | 138.5 | -56% | C |
| 231 | Spokane, WA | 229K | 138.5 | -56% | C |
| 232 | Amarillo, TX | 200K | 138.5 | -56% | C |
| 233 | Pomona, CA | 151K | 126.9 | -60% | B |
| 234 | Clarksville, TN | 167K | 126.9 | -60% | C |
| 235 | Pasadena, CA | 139K | 125.3 | -61% | A |
| 236 | Wilmington, NC | 115K | 125.3 | -61% | A |
| 237 | Springfield, MO | 169K | 125.3 | -61% | C |
| 238 | Augusta, GA | 202K | 122.9 | -61% | C |
| 239 | Bismarck, ND | 74K | 113.5 | -64% | B |
| 240 | Columbia, SC | 137K | 111.2 | -65% | C |
| 241 | Modesto, CA | 218K | 107.7 | -66% | A |
| 242 | Honolulu, HI | 351K | 107.7 | -66% | C |
| 243 | Irving, TX | 257K | 107.7 | -66% | C |
| 244 | Pueblo, CO | 112K | 97.5 | -69% | A |
| 245 | Chattanooga, TN | 181K | 97.5 | -69% | B |
| 246 | Garden Grove, CA | 173K | 97.5 | -69% | B |
| 247 | Pearland, TX | 126K | 97.5 | -69% | B |
| 248 | Santa Rosa, CA | 178K | 97.5 | -69% | B |
All rates per 100,000 residents. National average: 318.3/100K. Source: FBI UCR 2023, accessed via the FBI Crime Data Explorer.
How Vehicle Theft Fits Into the Safety Context Score
The Safety Context Score combines three FBI UCR signals: per-capita violent crime versus the U.S. average (40%), per-capita property crime versus the U.S. average (30%), and the direction of the 5-year trend (30%). Vehicle Theft is part of the property crime composite, so a city's vehicle theft rate flows into one of the two crime-rate components alongside the other offenses in that group. Read the full methodology.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does the FBI count as vehicle theft?
Motor vehicle theft is the theft or attempted theft of a motor vehicle — automobiles, trucks, motorcycles, and other vehicles meeting FBI definition. The category excludes farm equipment, bulldozers, airplanes, and watercraft. Motor vehicle theft is the single property-crime category that has risen sharply across many U.S. metros since 2019, driven partly by social-media-amplified vulnerabilities in specific keyless-ignition vehicle models and partly by changes in vehicle storage patterns.
What is the national average vehicle theft rate?
The U.S. national vehicle theft rate is 318.3 per 100,000 residents according to the most recent FBI UCR estimates. 34 of the 248 cities tracked here report rates above that average; 214 report rates below it. The U.S. rate itself is computed from the FBI's annual estimates that adjust for non-reporting agencies.
Why use per-capita rates instead of total vehicle theft counts?
Total counts unfairly penalize larger cities. A city of two million residents reporting more total vehicle theft incidents than a city of 50,000 is almost always safer per resident, but the raw count makes the larger city look worse. Per 100,000 residents — the FBI's standard unit — is the only fair basis for cross-city comparison.
How does vehicle theft fit into the Safety Context Score?
Vehicle Theft is part of the property crime composite, which contributes 30% of the Safety Context Score. Property crime — burglary, larceny-theft, and motor vehicle theft combined — is weighted less than violent crime because the per-incident impact is lower, even though it's far more common in absolute terms. The 5-year trend direction contributes another 30%.
Where can I verify these numbers?
Every figure traces back to the FBI Uniform Crime Reporting program, accessible at the FBI Crime Data Explorer (cde.ucr.cjis.gov). Population denominators come from U.S. Census Bureau estimates. The Bureau of Justice Statistics (bjs.ojp.gov) publishes complementary unreported-crime context through the National Crime Victimization Survey. The data is public domain.
Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation, Uniform Crime Reporting Program (2023), accessed via the FBI Crime Data Explorer. Population denominators from the U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program. Reporting context from the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Public domain.
Last refreshed 2026-04-06 · All rates per 100,000 residents.