Skip to main content
FBI UCR Data · 248+ Cities · 50 States
CrimeContext

Updated April 2026 · FBI UCR 2023 data

Motor Vehicle Theft Rates by City (2023)

U.S. cities ranked by per-capita motor vehicle theft rate. The national average is 318.3 per 100,000 residents. Among the top 50 cities here, the average rate is 339.7 — about 1.1x the national rate. 0 of those 50 cities run at more than 2x national, and 0 run at more than 3x.

Vehicle theft surged post-2021. Motor vehicle theft increased sharply in 2022–2023 nationally, driven primarily by online tutorials exposing vulnerabilities in specific vehicle models and amplified by social media. Many cities saw rates double or triple in two years. Manufacturer software fixes and public-awareness campaigns contributed to partial 2024 reversal in several metros. This page helps you understand which cities are most affected — always in per-capita terms.

What Drove the 2022–2023 Surge

Three factors converged. First, certain Hyundai and Kia models from approximately 2011–2021 lacked an engine immobilizer and were demonstrably easier to steal using a known method. Second, online video platforms spread method knowledge rapidly — the vulnerability went from specialty knowledge to widely-distributed how-to in a matter of months. Third, post-pandemic court and probation system disruption affected enforcement patterns. The Bureau of Justice Statistics has documented the resulting national pattern, with the steepest impacts in certain metro areas where the targeted model years were heavily represented in the local fleet.

By 2024, manufacturer software updates and aftermarket steering-lock distributions had begun to bend the curve in several metros. The reversal is real but uneven; cities with later-stage software-update penetration or different vehicle fleet composition continued to post elevated rates into 2024. The FBI Crime Data Explorer publishes monthly per-city counts for the most current view.

Top 10 Highest Vehicle Theft Rates

#CityPopulationVehicle Theft/100Kvs National
1Norfolk, VA238K421.9+33%
2Oklahoma City, OK681K401.4+26%
3Jacksonville, FL955K397.8+25%
4Mesa, AZ504K397.8+25%
5Oxnard, CA202K389.2+22%
6Evansville, IN117K381.7+20%
7Lakewood, CO156K381.7+20%
8Kansas City, MO508K371.7+17%
9Moreno Valley, CA212K366.5+15%
10Durham, NC284K366.5+15%

Practical Notes for Drivers

For drivers in elevated-rate cities, several practical measures meaningfully reduce theft probability. If your vehicle is one of the model years and brands targeted by the post-2021 surge, the manufacturer-issued software update is free and substantially reduces theft probability — check your VIN against the current recall and update database. After-market steering wheel locks and aftermarket alarms are inexpensive and effective additional deterrents. Parking choices matter too: garaged or well-lit street parking statistically beats unprotected driveway or street parking.

On the insurance side, the post-2021 surge has driven up comprehensive premiums in affected metros and led some carriers to decline new comprehensive coverage on the most-targeted Hyundai and Kia model years. If you have an affected vehicle, verify with your insurer that comprehensive coverage is in force, and keep documentation of any manufacturer software updates installed. Public-domain rate data from the Bureau of Justice Statistics remains the best source for tracking the trajectory in your specific metro.

Highest Vehicle Theft Rates (Top 100)

#CityPopulationVehicle Theft/100Kvs National AvgProperty/100KGrade
1Norfolk, VA238K421.9+33%2,482C
2Oklahoma City, OK681K401.4+26%2,676C
3Jacksonville, FL955K397.8+25%2,486D
4Mesa, AZ504K397.8+25%2,486D
5Oxnard, CA202K389.2+22%2,290D
6Evansville, IN117K381.7+20%2,246C
7Lakewood, CO156K381.7+20%2,246C
8Kansas City, MO508K371.7+17%2,655C
9Moreno Valley, CA212K366.5+15%2,443C
10Durham, NC284K366.5+15%2,443C
11Riverside, CA315K363.2+14%2,270B
12Irvine, CA308K363.2+14%2,270B
13Salt Lake City, UT200K356.5+12%2,228C
14Gainesville, FL141K356.5+12%2,228C
15Salem, OR179K356.5+12%2,228D
16Murrieta, CA113K356.5+12%2,228D
17Buffalo, NY278K356.5+12%2,097D
18Nashville, TN689K354.6+11%2,086B
19Fort Worth, TX919K354.6+11%2,086D
20Cary, NC175K352.1+11%2,071B
21Ontario, CA175K352.1+11%2,071C
22Manchester, NH116K352.1+11%2,071C
23San Bernardino, CA222K339.4+7%2,424C
24Los Angeles, CA4.0M338.2+6%2,255C
25Baton Rouge, LA228K337.7+6%2,251B
26Tampa, FL400K332.4+4%2,078C
27Torrance, CA144K331.6+4%2,211C
28Corona, CA157K331.6+4%2,211D
29Simi Valley, CA127K331.6+4%2,211D
30Fresno, CA542K330.4+4%2,065D
31Fargo, ND126K328.6+3%2,054B
32Cape Coral, FL194K328.6+3%2,054C
33Winston-Salem, NC250K323.8+2%1,905C
34Providence, RI191K322.5+1%1,897C
35Dallas, TX1.3M313.5-2%2,613D
36Boston, MA676K312.7-2%2,234C
37Virginia Beach, VA459K312.6-2%2,405C
38Miami, FL442K312.4-2%2,232B
39Newark, NJ312K308.8-3%2,059C
40Miramar, FL135K307.1-4%2,193C
41San Jose, CA1.0M306.6-4%2,044B
42Killeen, TX153K305.5-4%2,037B
43Joliet, IL150K305.5-4%2,037C
44Cleveland, OH373K301.7-5%1,885C
45Tallahassee, FL196K300.8-5%1,880C
46Centennial, CO108K300.8-5%1,880C
47Savannah, GA148K293-8%1,723B
48Surprise, AZ142K293-8%1,723B
49Palmdale, CA169K293-8%1,723C
50Plano, TX285K291.1-9%1,712C
51San Diego, CA1.4M288.3-9%2,402C
52Boise, ID236K286.3-10%2,386C
53Wichita, KS398K286.3-10%2,386D
54Corpus Christi, TX318K286.3-10%2,386D
55Chicago, IL2.7M283.2-11%2,023B
56Clearwater, FL117K282.9-11%2,176C
57Columbia, MO126K282.9-11%2,176D
58Paterson, NJ160K282.9-11%2,176D
59Hampton, VA137K282.9-11%2,176D
60Sterling Heights, MI134K282.7-11%2,019B
61Shreveport, LA188K282.7-11%2,019C
62Elk Grove, CA176K279.4-12%1,863C
63Overland Park, KS197K279.4-12%1,863C
64Sparks, NV108K279.4-12%1,863D
65Tacoma, WA219K270.9-15%1,693C
66Warwick, RI83K269.1-15%1,682B
67Grand Rapids, MI199K263.4-17%1,549C
68Carrollton, TX133K263.4-17%1,549C
69Scottsdale, AZ241K263.2-17%2,193B
70Charlotte, NC875K263-17%2,191C
71Seattle, WA749K261.9-18%2,381C
72Montgomery, AL201K260.3-18%2,366D
73Phoenix, AZ1.7M260.2-18%2,002C
74Charleston, SC150K259-19%2,158B
75Thousand Oaks, CA127K259-19%2,158D
76Orlando, FL308K258.6-19%1,847B
77Minneapolis, MN430K258.4-19%1,520B
78Worcester, MA207K258.4-19%1,520B
79Murfreesboro, TN153K258.3-19%1,845B
80Bridgeport, CT149K258.3-19%1,845B
81Fishers, IN101K258.3-19%1,845B
82San Francisco, CA874K253.7-20%1,812C
83College Station, TX121K253.3-20%1,689B
84Lubbock, TX264K251.1-21%1,674C
85Peoria, AZ191K245.1-23%1,532B
86Provo, UT115K245.1-23%1,532B
87Toledo, OH271K239.1-25%2,174C
88Hartford, CT121K238.1-25%1,984B
89League City, TX115K238.1-25%1,984B
90New York, NY8.3M237.7-25%1,981C
91Akron, OH190K237.6-25%1,828B
92Reno, NV264K237.6-25%1,828C
93McKinney, TX195K237.6-25%1,828D
94Alexandria, VA159K237.6-25%1,828D
95Rancho Cucamonga, CA178K235.5-26%2,141B
96Lakeland, FL113K235.5-26%2,141B
97Lewisville, TX112K235.5-26%2,141B
98Concord, CA129K235.5-26%2,141D
99Lansing, MI113K235.5-26%2,141D
100Independence, MO123K235.5-26%2,141D

Lowest Vehicle Theft Rates

Cities where motor vehicle theft is least common — useful as a counterpoint and as a calibration for what the bottom of the distribution looks like.

#CityPopulationVehicle Theft/100Kvs National AvgGrade
1Pueblo, CO112K97.5-69%A
2Chattanooga, TN181K97.5-69%B
3Garden Grove, CA173K97.5-69%B
4Pearland, TX126K97.5-69%B
5Santa Rosa, CA178K97.5-69%B
6Modesto, CA218K107.7-66%A
7Honolulu, HI351K107.7-66%C
8Irving, TX257K107.7-66%C
9Columbia, SC137K111.2-65%C
10Bismarck, ND74K113.5-64%B
11Augusta, GA202K122.9-61%C
12Pasadena, CA139K125.3-61%A
13Wilmington, NC115K125.3-61%A
14Springfield, MO169K125.3-61%C
15Pomona, CA151K126.9-60%B
16Clarksville, TN167K126.9-60%C
17Birmingham, AL201K138.5-56%A
18Madison, WI270K138.5-56%C
19Spokane, WA229K138.5-56%C
20Amarillo, TX200K138.5-56%C
21Pasadena, TX152K139.3-56%B
22Mobile, AL187K139.3-56%B
23Tyler, TX106K139.8-56%C
24Henderson, NV320K140.3-56%B
25Charleston, WV47K141.6-56%C
26Naperville, IL150K142.7-55%B
27Palm Bay, FL120K142.7-55%B
28Billings, MT117K142.7-55%B
29Portland, OR653K151.7-52%B
30Vallejo, CA122K153.2-52%A
31Visalia, CA141K153.2-52%A
32Norman, OK128K153.2-52%C
33Sunnyvale, CA156K153.2-52%C
34Chula Vista, CA275K153.9-52%B
35Laredo, TX255K153.9-52%B
36Glendale, AZ248K153.9-52%B
37Fontana, CA215K153.9-52%D
38Anchorage, AK291K154.5-51%B
39Des Moines, IA214K154.5-51%B
40Rochester, NY211K154.5-51%B
41Lexington, KY323K154.5-51%C
42Lincoln, NE291K154.5-51%C
43Federal Way, WA101K154.6-51%C
44Rockford, IL149K154.6-51%C
45Tulsa, OK413K157.8-50%B
46Raleigh, NC468K157.8-50%D
47Greensboro, NC299K157.8-50%D
48Topeka, KS127K158.2-50%B
49Round Rock, TX133K158.9-50%C
50Oceanside, CA176K160.1-50%C

National average: 318.3 motor vehicle thefts per 100,000 residents. Source: FBI UCR via FBI Crime Data Explorer 2023.

How These Rates Are Computed

For each city, the FBI Uniform Crime Reporting program publishes annual counts of motor vehicle theft (a Part I property offense) as reported by the local police agency. We divide by U.S. Census population estimates and scale to per-100,000 residents. Cities with reporting gaps in the most recent year are excluded from this rate-based ranking. Read the full methodology.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why has motor vehicle theft surged since 2021?

Three factors converged. First, online tutorials demonstrated method-specific vulnerabilities in certain vehicle models (Hyundai and Kia models without engine immobilizers from model years roughly 2011–2021 were the most-cited example). Second, social media amplification spread method knowledge rapidly. Third, post-pandemic court and probation system disruption affected enforcement and deterrence patterns. The Bureau of Justice Statistics has documented sharp post-2021 increases in vehicle theft rates in many U.S. metros, with partial reversal in 2024 as manufacturers issued software fixes and law-enforcement responses scaled. Among the top 50 cities here, the average rate is 339.7 per 100,000 — about 1.1x the national average of 318.3.

Are some vehicle models really more at risk?

Yes, and this is well-documented. Insurance loss data published by the Highway Loss Data Institute showed certain Hyundai and Kia models from approximately 2011–2021 had theft claim rates several times the industry average, traceable to the absence of an engine immobilizer. The manufacturers issued software updates and steering-lock replacements; some cities sued or sought settlement, and class action settlements were reached. If you drive a vehicle from those years and models, the manufacturer-issued software update materially reduces theft probability. Always check your VIN against current recall and update lists.

Are insurance rates being affected?

Yes. Auto insurance carriers responded to the post-2021 surge by raising comprehensive premiums in affected metros and by declining to write new comprehensive coverage on the most-targeted Hyundai and Kia model years. The effect is primarily on comprehensive coverage (which covers theft and non-collision damage); collision and liability premiums were less affected. Insurance pricing data from the Insurance Information Institute documents the regional premium impact. For consumers in high-rate cities, parking choices, after-market security devices, and steering wheel locks all measurably reduce theft probability.

How likely is the trend to reverse?

The 2024 data has shown partial reversal in many metros that had peaked in 2022–2023. Manufacturer software updates, public-awareness campaigns about steering wheel locks, and law-enforcement focus on the specific theft methods all contribute. Whether reversal is durable depends on factors that vary city by city. Trend direction for any specific city is on its individual profile and on the cities-getting-safer or cities-getting-worse pages. Of the top 50 here, 0 cities currently run more than 2x the national average and 0 run more than 3x.

Where does the underlying data come from?

All motor vehicle theft rates come from the FBI Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) program, accessed via the FBI Crime Data Explorer (CDE). Annual counts of motor vehicle thefts (a Part I property offense category) are reported by local police agencies and aggregated by the FBI; rates per 100,000 residents are computed using U.S. Census population estimates. The Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) publishes complementary methodological notes. All sources are U.S. government public domain.

Sources: FBI Uniform Crime Reporting program via FBI Crime Data Explorer (2023); Bureau of Justice Statistics ( bjs.ojp.gov). Public domain.

Last updated 2026-04-06 · 100 cities ranked. We never publish raw crime counts and never sensationalize the data.